“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last seen.
14. During the light in the position explained above, it truly is concluded that a civil servant features a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his personal and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency inside the duration of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
four. Record shows that the petitioner has been booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in All those cases, it does, prima facie, create that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're of your view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be issue to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion could possibly be considered, however, we're apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, issue to availability of vacancy topic to your approval of your competent authority.
In this website post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Discovering its provisions as well as the gravity of its punishment.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment in the grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any probable adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to be designed.
6. Mere involvement inside of a heinous offence isn't any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled with the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering that then he is guiding the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more necessary for further investigation, therefore, his continual incarceration would not serve any effective purpose at this stage.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Although the pair had two young children of their own at home, the social worker didn't explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report for the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had youthful children.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected towards the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only done In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were perfectly here mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the largest tragedy of all. It does the precise opposite of what a legal system is there to try and do, i.e. safe its citizens.
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or even to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
To get notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia and also the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become out there, please enter your contact information under.